Wednesday, February 15, 2023

cybersecurity conference list

from:  https://people.engr.tamu.edu/guofei/sec_conf_stat.htm




Computer Security Conference Ranking and Statistic

Guofei Gu


Ranking

Note:

  • How to judge how good a conference is? In my opinion, here are several criteria:
  • Acceptance ratio: definitely an important metric (maybe the easiest metric that can be quantified), but not the only metric
  • Paper quality and impact: how many classic papers are from this conference? how much impact do papers from this conference have on the community? are they well cited and studied?
  • Committee member quality: what's the quality of TPC members? are they noted researchers in this area? This is an important factor because they will affect the quality of submission (good papers will prefer to submit to the conference with noted researchers in the committee), and control the quality of accepted papers.
  • Attendee/Paper number ratio: another quantified metric. This somehow reflects the influence of this conference on the community
  • Location: a beautiful place has some attraction. In addition, many researchers (but not all) are not very willing to travel to other countries due to limited funding or time (or VISA problem...), so they just submit papers to local conferences. Thus, normally the conferences located in USA are better than in Europe, which is also better than in Asia.
  • History: a conference with a long history may have a good tradition and reputation
  • Industry connection: this somehow reflects the impact on the industry. Normally, conferences on more applied techniques will attract more industry partners (so have more money to improve the quality of conference)
  • Combining the first few criteria mentioned above, Dr. Jianying Zhou proposed a more quantitative metric (Conference Impact Factor, CIF). Please check out his page here.
  • This ranking list is only in my opinion. It is not official, nor accurate, only for reference. Some good workshops are also included.
  • I'm probably biased because I'm mainly a network/system security researcher. Notify me if you have different views, or you find significant conferences missing/bias. I'm more than happy to hear from you.
  • Some conferences are arguably better belonging to tier 1.5 or 2.5. At this time, I'm not going to differentiate these. Let me know if you have some strong comments.
  • Currently, I mainly focus on academic conferences and scientific publications. Thus, do not be surprised if you find other great conferences like Defcon/BlackHat/RSA are not included here.
  • Long time ago, I maintained a general computer science conference ranking (a mirror of my previous Georgia Tech page).
  • Other interesting/relevant resources: System security circus (top authors), Influential security papers

Tier 1
S&P (Oakland)
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
CCSACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security
SecurityUSENIX Security Symposium
NDSSISOC Network and Distributed System Security Symposium
-- Crypto conferences below --
Crypto International Cryptology Conference
EurocryptEuropean Cryptology Conference
Tier 2ESORICS European Symposium on Research in Computer Security
RAIDInternational Symposium on Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection
ACSACAnnual Computer Security Applications Conference
DSNThe International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks
IMCInternet Measurement Conference
ASIACCSACM Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security
PETSPrivacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium
EuroS&PIEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy
CSF (CSFW)IEEE Computer Security Foundations Symposium.
Supersedes CSFW (Computer Security Foundations Workshop)
-- Crypto conferences below --
AsiacryptInternational Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptology and Information Security
TCCTheory of Cryptography Conference
CHESConference on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems
Tier 3SecureComm Internation Conference on Security and Privacy in Communication Networks
CNS
IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security
DIMVAGI SIG SIDAR Conference on Detection of Intrusions and Malware and Vulnerability Assessment
ACNSInternational Conference on Applied Cryptography and Network Security
SACACM Symposium on Applied Computing
ACISPAustralasia Conference on Information Security and Privacy
ICICSInternational Conference on Information and Communications Security
ISCInformation Security Conference
ICISCInternational Conference on Information Security and Cryptology
SACMATACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies
IFIP SECIFIP International Information Security Conference
WiSec
(WiSe, SASN)
ACM Conference on Wireless Network Security
Supersedes WiSe (ACM Workshop on Wireless Security) and SASN (ACM Workshop on Security of Ad-Hoc and Sensor Networks)
SOUPSSymposium On Usable Privacy and Security
IFIP WG 11.9IFIP WG 11.9 International Conference on Digital Forensics
DFRWSDigital Forensic Research Conference
CODASPY
ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy
MALCON
International Conference on Malicious and Unwanted Software
-- Crypto conferences below --
FSEConference on Fast Software Encryption (FSE)
PKCInternational Conference on Practice and Theory in Public Key Cryptography
FCInternational Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security
CT-RSARSA Conference, Cryptographers' Track
HOSTIEEE International Symposium on Hardware Oriented Security and Trust
-- Workshops below --
HotSecUSENIX Summit on Hot Topics in Security
NSPWNew Security Paradigms Workshop
IH&MMSecWorkshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security
IWIAIEEE International Information Assurance Workshop
Others (Obsolete, or not ranked)SecDev
IEEE Secure Development Conference
ISPECInformation Security Practice and Experience Conference
NordSecNordic Conference on Secure IT Systems
ICITSInternational Conference on Information Theoretic Security


Acceptance Ratio Statistic

Note:

  • This could be the most complete (and accurate?) list of computer security conference statistics you can find on Internet. There are still some blanks in this list. If you have any reliable source of these information (or some other security conferences), please email me (guofei AT cse.tamu.edu). Thanks.
  • You can see from the following statistic, security conferences are becoming harder and harder to get in in the recent five years! And I think this trend will possible continue in the near future.
  • Unless noted, the acceptance typically only counts regular (full) papers.


 YearTier 1Tier 2Tier 3Year
IEEE S&PACM CCSUSENIX SecurityNDSSCSF/CSFWESORICSRAIDACSACASIACCSIMCSecureCommDIMVAACNSSOUPSDFRWS
2022



19.4%(32/165)
18.5%(104/562)
25%(35/139)



28%(11/39)


2022
202112.1%(115/952)22.3%(196/879)18.7%(246/1316)15.2%(87/573)25%(43/172)20.2%(71/351)23.2%(32/138)24.5%(80/326)18.9%(70/370)27%(53/196)

19.9%(37/186)

2021
202012.4%(104/841)16.9%(121/715)
16.1%(157/977)
17.4%(88/506)25%(29/116)

25.6%(31/121)23%(70/302)21.8%(67/308)24.5%( 53/216)
29%(13/45)



2020
2019
12%(84/679)
16%(149/934)
15.5%(113/729)17%(89/52)134%(30/89)
19.4%(67/344)
22%(37/166)
22.6%(60/266)
17%(44/258, regular paper)
20%(39/197)
25.5%(38/149)
28.8%(23/80)


2019
2018
11.5%(63/549)
16.6%(134/809)
19.1%(100/524)
21.5%(71/331)
35%(25/72)

22.8%(33/145)
20%(60/299)
16.8%(52/310)
24.7%(43/174)

 

21%(28/132)

2018
2017
13%(60/457)
17.9%(151/843)
16.3%(85/522)
16%(68/423)
34%(32/94)
16%(54/338)
20%(21/105)
19.7%(48/244)
18.7%(67/359)
23.4%(42/179)


22.8%(34/149)
27%(26/98)

2017
2016
13.3%(55/413)
16.5%(137/831)
15.6(72/463)
15.4%(60/389)
35.6%(31/87)
21%(60/285)
25%(21/84)
22.8%(48/210)
21%(73/350)25%(46/184)

31.8%(21/66)
19%(35/183)
28%(22/79)

2016
2015
13.5%(55/407)
19.8%(128/646)
15.7%(67/426)
16.9%(51/302)
34%(35/102)
20%(59/293)
23.5%(28/119)
24.4%(47/193)
17.8%(48/269, regular), 23%(62/269)26%(44/169)
28%(30/108)
22.7%(17/75)
21% (33/157)
24%(22/93)
34.8%(16/46)
2015
2014
13%(44/334)
19.5%(114/585)19%(67/350)
18.6%(55/295)
35%(29/83)
24.8%(58/234)
19.4%(22/113)
19.9%(47/236)
19.6%(50/255)22.4%(43/192)
27.6%(27/98)
23.3%(14/60)
22.5%(33/147)
26%(21/80)
28.8%(15/52)
2014
201312%(38/315)
19.8%(105/530)15.9%(44/277)
18.8%(47/250)26%(19/73)
17.8%(43/242)
23.1%(22/95)
20%(34/171)
16%(35/216,regular)
28%(61/216)
23.6%(42/178)37%(26/70)
31.6%(12/38)
23.3%(35/150)
29.4%(15/51)
26.5%(13/49)
2013
201213%(40/307)18.9%(80/423)19.4%(43/222)18%(46/258)24.8%(25/101)
20.2%(50/248)
21%(18/84)
19%(44/231)22%(35/159,regular)
30.8%(49/159)
24.6%(45/183)28.8%(21/73)31%(14/45)17.2%(33/192)
21%(14/67)
29.8%(14/47)2012
201111%(34/306)14%(60/429)17%(35/204)20%(28/139)26%(21/81)23.2%(36/155)23%(20/87)20%(39/195)16%(35/217,regular)
27.6%(60/217)
19%(42/220)35.8%(23+11/95)31.7%(13/41)18%(31/172)33%(15/45)22.5%(14/62)2011
201011.6% (31/267)17.2%(55/320)14.9%(30/202)15.4%(24/156)28%(23/81)20.8%(42/201)23%(24/104) 17%(39/227)15% (25/166)22%(47/211, both short and full)25%(28/112)34%(12/35) 18%(32/178)24.6%(16/65)41%(16/39)2010
200910% (26/253)18.4%(58/315)14.7%(26/176)11.7% (20/171)23.6%(22/93) 19.1%(42/220)28.8%(17/59)19.6%(44/224)22.4% (33/147, regular)
27% (40/147)
22.4%(41/183, both short and full)25.3%(19/75,full paper)
34.7%(26/75)   
29.5%(13/44)21% (32/150)30.6%(15/49)37.5%(15/40)2009
200811.2% (28/249)18%(51/281) 15.9% (27/170)17.8% (21/118) 18%(21/115)22%(37/168)25%(20/80)24%(42/173)17.6% (32/182,regular)
22.5% (41/182)
17.3%(32/185,both short and full) 21%(26/124) 33%(14/42)22.9%(30/131)30%(13/43)39.5%(17/43)2008
20078% (20/246,full paper)
12% (29/246)
18% (55/303)12.3% (23/187)14.4% (18/125) 25%(25/101)23.8%(39/164)18% (18/100)22%(42/191)18.3% (33/180,regular)
29.4% (53/180, including short paper)
24.4%(21/86, full paper)26%(31/119)24.6%(14/57)12% (31/260)29%(12/41)47.2%(17/36)2007
20069.2% (23/251, full paper)
12.7% (32/251)
14.8%(38/256)
12.3% (22/179)
13.4% (17/127) 24.5%(25/102)20%(32/160)17% (16/93)30%(40/134)17.7% (33/186) Start from 200621% (19/92, full paper track)25.4%(32/126)26.8%(11/41)15.1% (33/218)36%(14/39)44.4%(16/36)2006
20058.9% (17/192)15.2% (38/250)14.8% (22/149)12.9% (16/124)20.8% (20/96)17.0% (27/159)20.5% (17/83)22.8% (45/197)
27% (22/82, full paper)22.2% (32/144, full paper)
36.1% (52/144)
Start from 2005
27%(14/51)22.2% (35/158)26%(10/39) 2005
200410.2% (19/186)13.9% (35/251)12.0% (22/184)16.3% (16/98)? (20/?)17.0% (27/159)13.5% (16/118)26.1% (35/134)
19% (19/98,full paper) 34%(14/41)
Start from 2004
12.1% (36/297)  2004
200314.5% (19/131)13.8% (35/253)
16.4% (21/128)
20.5% (17/83)? (17/?)16.7% (19/114)29.5% (13/44)30%(60/119)

26% (19/73, full paper)  16.8% (32/191)
Start from 2003
  2003
200222.1% (21/95)17.6% (27/153)16.9% (22/130)19.0% (15/79)27.4% (23/84)19.3% (16/83)25.0% (16/64)32.3%(33/102) 
24% (15/62, full paper)     2002
200117.8% (19/107)17.6% (27/153)28.9% (24/83)24.2% (16/66)38.9% (21/54)not held21.8% (12/55)31.9%(38/119)

26% (14/53), Start from 2001     2001
200013.1% (18/137)21.2% (28/132)20/?29.4% (15/51)45.8% (22/48)25.3% (19/75)53.8% (14/26)42%(42/100)
      2000
199924.6% (15/61)19.3% (16/83)27%(18/67) 40.4% (19/47)not held? (32/?) 
      1999
199816.4% (19/116)20.0% (17/85)27.7%(18/65)33.3% (15/45) 40.4% (23/57)67.3% (35/52)
Start from 1998
 
      1998
199718.2% (20/110)26.6% (17/64)not held13/? not held 

 
 
  1997
199629.9% (20/67)32.2% (19/59)21/?14/? 36.2% (21/58) 

 
 
  1996
199527.8% (20/72)not held21/?
 not held 

 
 
  1995
199429.2% (19/65)44.3% (31/70)not held15/?
Start from 1994

36.6% (26/71)


 
 
  1994
199324.3% (17/70)45.0% (27/60)
Start from 1993
13/? 
not held


   
  1993
199223.6% (21/89) 27/?


? (24/?)


 
 
  1992
199130.4% (28/92)
not held


not held


 
 
  1991
1990?(34/?)
25/?

? (?/?)
Start from 1990



 
 
  1990
1989?(30/?)
not held

 


 
 
  1989
1988?(26/?)
Start from 1988?
Start from 1988



 
 
  1988
1987?(26/?)


 



 
 
  1987
198627.5% (25/91)







 
 
  1986
198539.7% (25/63)





Start from 1985
 
 
  1985
198464.1% (25/39)
 





 
 
  1984
198367.6% (23/34)







 
 
  1983
198255.9% (19/34)







 
 
  1982
1981?(18/?)       
      1981
1980100% (19/19)
Start from 1980
       
      1980

  

Thanks the following people for information and suggestions/comments on the ranking and statistic: Kevin Almeroth, Marco Balduzzi, Kevin Borgolte, Billy Brumley, Kevin Butler, Juan Caballero, Michele Campobasso, Yinzhi Cao, Jihyuk Choi, Nicolas Christin, Mihai Christodorescu, John Clemens, Ton van Deursen, Sven Dietrich, David Evans, Clement Fung, Simson Garfinkel, Edy Glatz, Payas Gupta, J. Alex Halderman, Ragib Hasan, Thorsten Holz, Muhammad Ikram, Ashar Javed, Chang-han Jong, Paul A. Karger, Jonathan Katz, Brian Levine, Yuhang Lin, Zhiqiang Lin, Martin Andreoni Lopez, Peter Mell, Weizhi (Yuxin) Meng, Antonis Michalas, Abedelaziz Mohaisen, Lukasz Olejnik, Hamed Okhravi, Mert D. Pesé, Juan D. Parra Rodriguez, Christian Rossow, Kent Seamons, Monirul Sharif, Jaryn Shen, Ivo Sluganovic, Robin Sommer, Chao Yang, Vinod Yegneswaran, Zhiyuan Zheng, Jianying Zhou, Thomas Zimmermann, ... and you.

No comments:

Post a Comment