- Score: Choose a score from the given scale.
- 3: Strong Accept
- 2: Accept
- 1: Weak Accept
- 0: Borderline Paper
- -1: Weak Reject
- -2: Reject
- -3: Strong Reject
- Justification: Provide a detailed review including justifications for the score given. Consider the following aspects in your review:
- Relevance to Conference Themes: Evaluate how well the abstract aligns with the conference themes.
- Originality and Innovation: Assess the novelty and innovative aspects of the research.
- Scientific Rigor and Methodology: Examine the robustness of the research methods and analysis.
- Clarity and Quality of Writing: Consider how clearly the abstract is written and the quality of the presentation.
- Significance and Impact: Evaluate the potential impact of the research on the field.
- Results and Evidence: Brief but clear, and appropriate for the type of submission
- References and Citations: Check the adequacy and relevance of the literature cited.
Reviewer's Confidence
- Select your confidence level in reviewing this abstract:
- 5: Expert
- 4: High
- 3: Medium
- 2: Low
- 1: None
Confidential Remarks for the Program Committee
- Optional Field: Provide any additional remarks intended only for the program committee members. These remarks will not be shared with the authors.
- Include any concerns or comments that could help the program committee in making their decision.
- Highlight any specific strengths or weaknesses that are critical for the
No comments:
Post a Comment